• Some moron is sending me a large number of trackbacks linked to non-existent sites.  What’s the point of that? 

    UPDATE: Someone has kindly posted a link to another blogger who has had the same problem and apparently understands what it’s all about.  It seems that these morons are testing a new script, and presumably they’ll be back later with links to real website addresses.  Typepad addressed the comment spam problem by making the links indirect and therefore useless for fooling Google, so I hope they have something planned for this as well. 

  • I haven’t felt like posting anything for the last few days.  I don’t have anything original or incisive to say about the earthquake and Tsunami, and the ever-rising death toll makes it seem inappropriate to write about anything else.

    BWG posted a comment to my earlier post, mentioning a new collective effort by a group of bloggers about The South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami and I’ll highlight it here for anyone who is interested.

    Happy New Year, and I hope that normal service will be resumed on Monday.

  • Archives can now be found here

  • It’s hard to escape from the aftermath of Sunday’s earthquake.  Today’s newspaper is full of grisly photographs of dead bodies, and for once it seems appropriate (though I am sure there will still be complaints). 

    As feared, the death toll is still rising, though it’s a sobering thought that (as Harry reminds us), it will still fall far short of the number who died in Tangshan, China in 1976.  The official estimate was around 250,000, but the figure may well have been substantially higher. 

    I can’t really add anything useful to what others have said.  Shaky has pointed out that there is already a comprehensive Wikipedia article on the subject:

    Based on one seismic model, some of the smaller islands southwest of Sumatra have moved southwest up to 20 m (66 ft). The northern tip of Sumatra, which is on the Burma Plate as opposed to the southern regions on the Sunda Plate, may also have moved southwest up to 36 m (120 ft).

    It’s really hard to comprehend the enormity of it all.

  • I suppose that, if we’re honest, many natural disasters are easy to ignore because we have no real way to relate to what happened.  Somewhere a long way away, thousands of people we don’t know have been killed and a foreign country has been badly affected.

    For me, Sunday’s earthquake off the coast of Indonesia and the devastation it caused in a large part of Asia certainly had a much greater impact.

    Mainly because I have visited several of the countries that were affected and I know people who live there.  I’ve been to places such as Penang and Phuket where many people died.  It is entirely possible that I could have been in one of those places on Sunday, rather than safe at home in Hong Kong.

    One report yesterday said that the Laguna Phuket resort had been totally destroyed. Having stayed there not that long ago (and having considered going back there this Chritsmas) this certainly made it very real.  Fortunately it seems that this particular resort was not badly affected – only one person is missing and all the hotels are operating normally. 

    However, other resorts on Phuket were very badly affected, and it’s not hard to imagine the devastating impact any number of seafront hotels might have suffered from the tidal waves.  One tourist is quoted as saying he only survived "because he had left the ground floor dining room of his hotel after breakfast to pack".  I’d be much more likely to be eating breakfast at that time in the morning rather than sitting by the pool or on the beach, but that might not have made any difference.

    And yet… we have to remember that this is not just about foreign tourists.  It’s about the local people who worked in the hotels, and about people going about their ordinary everday business in Sri Lanka or Indonesia or India.  Entire communities wiped out, and probably considerably more than the current estimate of 20,000 dead.  Scary stuff.  Never underestimate Mother Nature.

  • Since it started broadcasting in the UK 23 years ago, Channel Four has shown "The Snowman" every Christmas Day.  I remember Jeremy Isaacs saying that as long as he was controller of Channel Four it would be guaranteed a place in the schedule, and in fact it has long outlasted his involvement with the channel.

    Obviously I wasn’t in Hong Kong in 1982, but I seem to recall that it has been a regular in the Christmas TV schedules (on TVB Pearl, I think) since I’ve been here.  Not this year, as far as I can see (and I hope they’re not showing it after Christmas).  It’s not as if the schedules are packed full of other superior seasonal fare (as if anything could be better than "The Snowman"), so I don’t think they’ve got any excuses.

    Oh, and Happy Christmas   

  • Shopping Centres have been in the news recently, with the government’s attempt to sell off the ones it (somewhat inexplicably) owns and manages. Seems like a good plan to me – most shopping centres on public housing estates are rundown and unattractive, and new management will surely bring about some improvements.

    Shopping Centres play a fairly central role in Hong Kong life. Mainly because because a large air-conditioned mall is not an unattractive place to pass the time if you live in a tiny apartment with your mother-in-law, grandmother, or other assorted members of your extended family. Also, there are relatively few standalone shops and in many places walking along the street is often difficult and unpleasant. The connecting walkways above street level are also a good way of getting around, particular in the Central/Admiralty area, and new towns such as Tsuen Wan, Sha Tin and Tuen Mun.

    Anyone who has spent any time in Hong Kong will know that there are all manner of different shopping centres dotted around the place, some very successful, others almost deserted. What makes the difference between success and failure?

    (more…)

  • Given the title, this is a book I had to read, though I have to admit I was expecting something a little different – maybe more like Liam Fitzpatrick's tales of 'Bottoms Up'.

    Martin Booth wrote 'Gweilo' because (just over two years ago) he was diagnosed with a brain tumour. His children asked him to write about his childhood, and he completed the book shortly before he died earlier this year.

    What surprised me about the book was that it covers only a three year period in the 1950's, from when the author left the UK at the age of 7 to travel with his parents to Hong Kong, to their return exactly three years later (in May 1955). They were back in Hong Kong in 1959 and this time stayed much longer, finally leaving for the UK in 1972, but this book only covers that first stay.

    Martin Booth says in the introduction that he felt that it smacked of arrogance to write an autobiography. I'm not sure about that, though it's certainly true that most published autobiographies are by famous people, presumably because the publishers expect them to sell well. Unfortunately most famous people turn out to desperately dull, and their autobiographies disappointingly unrevealing. Not this one, though.

    (more…)

  • Most idiotic comment on the Link Reit fiasco must be from Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands Michael Suen Ming-yeung. He is quoted as saying:

    "It’s like a 9/11-style attack … No one can be blamed because you can’t expect this to happen."

    This rather neatly sums up what went wrong. The government employed a large number of "experts" to advise them on the privitisation and share issue, and none of them anticipated a legal challenge? You really don’t have to look very far to see the privatisation has always been controversial, and it is not surprising that someone who is against it might want to take legal action.

    The solution to this little puzzle was to ensure that the Housing Ordinance was amended, and then to ensure that if there was going to be any legal action it was completed before the public listing took place. The legislation would have passed, and the legal action would have been won, and then the listing would have been straightforward.

  • I am not sure whether they are supposed to be funny, but some of the articles in the Sunday Morning Post about other people’s homes can be quite entertaining. 

    This week we have a small family that have two adjacent properties on Lantau, each one a modest 2,000 square feet.  One for them, the other for visitors, apparently.  Skimming through the article, they would seem to have purchased most of their furniture from street markets in Beijing.  As you do…

    The best bit for me was the photograph of the stairs.  Nothing special about them as far as I could see (I’m guessing they connect the upstairs and downstairs), but one can’t help noticing the white (phone?) cabling running up the stairs.  It rather spoils the whole carefully cultivated image of understated elegance.  PCCW strikes again!