I was reading this in the SCMP, and I’m not sure what to make of it:
Men who go to the mainland to find a wife have characteristics that make them more likely than most to become wife beaters … most of these men have strong egos and want an obedient wife. They apparently feel more powerful on the mainland, where they have more spending power.
Well, that plus the fact there are a lot of women in China who see marriage to a foreigner as a way of escaping to a better lifestyle.
Men who seek wives on the mainland tend to see women as possessions, and seem to believe they can do whatever they want to their wives because they pay for their living expenses. Some also see marriage as a means towards finding someone to take care of their parents.
I suppose the idea that anyone could go somewhere for the express purpose of “finding a wife” is a bit scary to me. Did anyone see that marvellous Louis Theroux documentary about elderly men going to Bangkok (I think) to find a wife to take back to the UK? They mainly wanted women who would obey them, whereas the women somehow believed that the men were rich and they would enjoy a much better lifestyle in the UK. No prizes for guessing how things turned out when they discovered that their new husbands owned nothing more than a 2-up, 2-down in Redditch and that the weather wasn’t quite as good as in Thailand.
“It is better that more people seek help rather than avoiding the problem,” Ms Wong said. “If they just keep it bottled up, it could create tragedies like homicides.”
Er, yes, best to avoid “tragedies like homicides”. Do people really talk like that?
I am somewhat at a loss to understand what conclusion we should draw from this piece. Isn’t it obvious that these marriages are much more likely to fail? Of course, the people who need to realize that are most unlikely to be reading the SCMP, and even if they did they would probably still get married regardless.
Or am I just being too cynical?
Leave a reply to Shane Cancel reply