Typepad is reasonably user-friendly, but I still have to key everything in using a web brower, which is not ideal (and makes it all too easy to lose your work). So I’ve been testing Blogjet, which is a small application that allows you to create posts offline and publish them. There are others, such as w.Bloggar, which I have only evaluated very briefly, and Zempt which admits to several bugs with Typepad.
Other good thing about these applications are that they make it easier to do clever formatting, they have spellcheckers and they enable you to save posts to disk.
There are two main problems. The first is that these application is not just designed for use with Typepad, and they are trying to accomodate the features and quirks of many different blog services, meaning that not all Typepad features are yet implemented. So, for example, you can’t do future-dated posts, or extended posts.
The second is that they seem to have difficulty with the way that some of the blog services implement certain features. Presumably this is because there is no formal documentation, and standards (such as they are) are not always followed. This means there are annoying bugs. Blogjet allows you to save ‘draft’ posts but then publishes them anyway. w.Bloggar and Zempt seems quite unable to retrieve postings from Typepad (Zempt has it on their list of known bugs). To be fair, Blogjet have fixed a number of the bugs, but it doesn’t inspire confidence when they blame Typepad for the problems without giving a clear explanation of what is wrong, and then fix them without Typepad doing anything!
My dilemma is this – do I pay for software that is obviously not working properly and needs to be enhanced, or do I wait for it to get better?
Leave a reply to fumier Cancel reply