What is it with people who design websites?  The SCMP website has been re-designed, and of course it looks better, but…

One of the better features of the old SCMP site was ‘Today’s Stories’, a single (simple) page with all the stories in that day’s paper.  You could even go back over the last 7 days and fairly easily find recent stories.

That’s gone.

What else have they “improved”?  Well, rather puzzlingly, stories can now stray on to a 2nd page, with just a single sentence on page 2.   

However, I think my favourite is the headlines with missing words, such as:

  • “He sold cigarettes, now he’s selling …”  Let me guess – is it cigars?  Or cheese?
  • “Gateway Capital joins Zhuhai rush with…”
  • “Thousands of home sellers facing…” 
  • “Would you drink the tap water being…”

Angus Deayton eat your heart out.

Any actual improvements?  Well, yes, they have some RSS feeds (finally), but if you were hoping to be able to click on them and add them to your favourite RSS reader you’ll be out of luck.  On the other hand, if you’d like to copy the link from the annoying little box that pops up then, yes, you can do that.  Right…

In theory, readers now have access to the full archive (in the past, each subscriber was granted a generous allowance of 10 articles that they could retrieve, though you could buy more articles if you wished).  However, so far I am not having much luck finding any articles.

And you still have to pay to access the website.  Good thinking, chaps.

Posted in

7 responses to “New, improved, worse”

  1. Joel avatar
    Joel

    a single (simple) page with all the stories in that day’s paper
    I don’t think so. They never had all the stories.
    Unless they have the full (at least local) content of the paper online, it’s not worth paying for.
    And I mean photos and text.
    I’m a big fan of Newsstand.com. I download the full newspaper, from the first page to the last page, as a sort of PDF file, and can zoom in and out of everthing from the stories to all the ads.
    Now that’s how to get all the content

    Like

  2. dave avatar

    Joel, they certainly had far more stories (especially local) than they do now.
    Newsstand.com isn’t an option for the SCMP.

    Like

  3. Joel avatar
    Joel

    But if they expect people to pay for content, they should have ALL of the stories in the daily paper.
    And I mean even the short one paragraph items.
    Podcasts and video, well, that’s different.
    Newsstand? Well, I suppose big papers could do it, but I was noting how good that really is.

    Like

  4. dave avatar

    I agree with you that they should have all the content. It’s especially galling that they’ve gone from having most of the content to having almost none of the content and made it more complicated and difficult to access.
    It’s doubly galling that I just renewed my subscription for something which is now almost completely useless to me.
    Can anyone find Jake Van der Kamp’s Monitor Column? I found it last week, but couldn’t find it this morning.

    Like

  5. Chris avatar

    Well, yes, they should have all the content on the website. The problem is that so much of the paper is filled up with agency stories, and presumably they don’t have the Internet rights.
    I couldn’t find Jake van der Kamp either. Their ‘column finder’ drop-down shows “Monitor” as one of the options, but if you click on it you are deposited into the search engine that can’t find anything. Very poor.

    Like

  6. Joel avatar
    Joel

    All of the local content, including photographs should be part of the deal.
    Yes, there are rights issues with international stories, but if you are already on the Internet, it’s not a problem.
    Until they have every single local story, paragraph, photo, it’s a waste of money subscribing.

    Like

  7. dave avatar

    I found the Monitor column; it’s on the business page:
    http://www.scmp.com/portal/site/SCMP/menuitem.f4cac14c713efea733492d9253a0a0a0/?s=idx_Business&ss=
    but they’ve broken the links to previous columns.

    Like

Leave a comment