What does it mean? How can anyone be “Motivated by trees and fish”. Aren’t there some words missing from that sentence?
Anyway, here’s the letter in full from today’s SCMP, and a small prize for someone who can tell me what it means:
Motivated by trees and fish
I wish to reply to a number of claims made by Paul Serfarty (“Sad perspective on how world must be ordered”, June 2).
Whether or not the LNG plant planned near the Soko Islands will reduce sulfur and nitrogen oxides, or so-called global warming emissions, environmentalists seem opposed to the proposed LNG plant in principle. They want a “short delay” to something that can supposedly help humans.
I don’t think their primary motivation is Mr Serfarty’s so-called “public good”, or free markets. Many environmentalists are primarily motivated by trees and fish. Secondly, I do not think that every value can be reduced to money.
While I support free markets and think money is a very valuable tool to help trade, the ultimate standard of value for every human being should be their own individual life.
There are many non-material values that can add greatly to someone’s life.
However, one must usually act to gain a value, even if it is a non-material one. A value rarely drops into someone’s lap.
Opposition to bureaucracy does not mean support for disorder.
Fortunately order follows from rationality, so free societies that respect rationality are basically orderly.
Of course, the rule of law in a free society can help protect the legitimate rights of a rational man from those that try to muscle reason aside.
Simon Patkin, Quarry Bay
Go on – all you have to do is convert this collection of sentences into something vaguely coherent. Then maybe we’ll have some idea what he is on about.
Leave a reply to clive randall Cancel reply