As you may have noticed, I find the letter column in the SCMP a great source of amusement. This letter was published yesterday:
Racial discrimination
It happened again! Last Sunday, I went shopping in Central with a Filipina friend who is a sales and marketing executive for a satellite television service company in Hong Kong.
At the IFC tower, she felt a need to use the toilet and went to the one on level P1. Unfortunately, there was a long queue of people waiting, and she decided to use the one on P3 instead. She was asked by the attendant if she was a Filipina. She confirmed that she was and the attendant then told her rudely that she should not be using the facility.
I was furious when I heard what had happened.
Why can’t a Filipina use those toilets? The toilets are there for public use. This is very clearly a case of racial discrimination. Filipinos contribute to our economy, not just as domestic helpers, but also as engineers, managers, accountants and other professionals.
JOEL TRINIDAD CATAGUE, Tsuen Wan
The part I loved was where the letter writer goes to great lengths to stress that his friend is “a sales and marketing executive” (i.e. not a domestic helper). If he had simply said that his friend was a Filipina wouldn’t that have made the point about racial discrimination just as effectively?
I suppose the writer is also Filipino, and I’m sure that the management of the IFC don’t stop him using the toilets, so I wonder what sort of discrimination we are talking about here?

Leave a reply to Chris Cancel reply